DB v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions & Ors
The First-tier Tribunal's decision involved an error of law due to inadequate findings of fact and insufficient reasons regarding which parent provided more day-to-day care; the appeals are allowed and remitted for rehearing.
- Parties
- Appellant: DB; First Respondent: Secretary of State for Work and Pensions; Second Respondent: SB
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 21 January 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Upper Tribunal Decision Remitting to First Tier Tribunal
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; First-tier Tribunal decision set aside and case remitted for rehearing.
- Legal Topics
- Child Support, Day to Day Care, Tribunal Procedure, Adequacy of Reasons
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
DB
Appellant
Secretary of State for Work and Pensions
First Respondent
SB
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Upper Tribunal Decision Remitting to First Tier Tribunal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the First-tier Tribunal made adequate findings of fact regarding day-to-day care
- 2 Whether the Tribunal provided sufficient reasons for its decision
- 3 Whether the correct legal test was applied to determine which parent provides more day-to-day care
Ratio Decidendi
The First-tier Tribunal's decision involved an error of law due to inadequate findings of fact and insufficient reasons regarding which parent provided more day-to-day care; the appeals are allowed and remitted for rehearing.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; First-tier Tribunal decision set aside and case remitted for rehearing.
Orders
- Appeals remitted to First-tier Tribunal for reconsideration at oral hearing.
- Remitted appeals to be heard by a new tribunal, excluding previous judges.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment