DD (A Child), In the Matter Of [2025] EWFC 500 (B) (29 August 2025)
The court found that the child’s welfare required the development of a relationship with her father through regular unsupervised contact, with handovers via a third party and the father subject to an undertaking to abstain from drug use for 24 hours before contact. The mother’s opposition to contact and attempts to exclude the father were not justified by the evidence. The father was granted parental responsibility. The court found no basis for a fact-finding hearing on the mother’s allegations, and the evidence did not support restricting contact to supervised only.
- Citation
- [2025] EWFC 500 (B)
- Parties
- Applicant: DDF; First Respondent: DDM; Second Respondent: DD (by her guardian)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 29 August 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Child Arrangements / Family Law Children Act 1989 / Final Judgment After Contested Hearing and Submissions
- Outcome
- Application granted in part; final child arrangements order made.
- Legal Topics
- Child Arrangements Order, Parental Responsibility, Declaration of Parentage, Contact Disputes, Welfare of the Child, Domestic Abuse Allegations, Drug Use Allegations, Psychological Assessment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
DDF
Applicant
DDM
First Respondent
DD (by her guardian)
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Child Arrangements / Family Law Children Act 1989 / Final Judgment After Contested Hearing and Submissions
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the father should have unsupervised contact with the child
- 2 Whether a parental responsibility order should be made in favour of the father
- 3 Whether the mother’s allegations (including drug use and sexual assault) preclude contact or parental responsibility
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the child’s welfare required the development of a relationship with her father through regular unsupervised contact, with handovers via a third party and the father subject to an undertaking to abstain from drug use for 24 hours before contact. The mother’s opposition to contact and attempts to exclude the father were not justified by the evidence. The father was granted parental responsibility. The court found no basis for a fact-finding hearing on the mother’s allegations, and the evidence did not support restricting contact to supervised only.
Court Disposition
Application granted in part; final child arrangements order made.
Orders
- Father to have regular unsupervised contact with the child, with handovers via a third party (Mr B or Ms L, or others as agreed)
- Father to abstain from drug use for 24 hours before contact and to provide undertakings to that effect
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment