Maxwell v R [2017] EWCA Crim 1233 (22 August 2017)

Maxwell v R [2017] EWCA Crim 1233 (22 August 2017)

Convictions and sentences for low-value shoplifting offences (Counts 1, 16, 18) were a nullity as they were summary-only offences not properly included on the indictment; sentencing errors required reduction of the total sentence and amendment of the driving disqualification order.

Citation
[2017] EWCA Crim 1233
Parties
Appellant: Dean Christopher Maxwell; Respondent: R
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
22 August 2017
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence
Outcome
appeal allowed in part
Legal Topics
Low Value Shoplifting, Indictment Procedure, Sentencing, Totality, Driving Disqualification
Criminal Law Low Value Shoplifting Indictment Procedure Sentencing Totality Driving Disqualification

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 11 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Dean Christopher Maxwell

Appellant

R

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether convictions for low-value shoplifting offences were validly included on the indictment
  2. 2 Whether the sentencing was lawful and compliant with statutory requirements
  3. 3 Whether the total sentence was excessive given the circumstances

Ratio Decidendi

Convictions and sentences for low-value shoplifting offences (Counts 1, 16, 18) were a nullity as they were summary-only offences not properly included on the indictment; sentencing errors required reduction of the total sentence and amendment of the driving disqualification order.

Court Disposition

appeal allowed in part

Orders

  • Convictions and sentences for Counts 1, 16, and 18 quashed
  • Total sentence reduced from 7 years 4 months to 6 years imprisonment