Wokingham Borough Council v Jules & Anor [2021] EWHC 3135 (QB) (24 November 2021)

Wokingham Borough Council v Jules & Anor [2021] EWHC 3135 (QB) (24 November 2021)

The defendants admitted breaching the injunction, but had substantially purged their contempt, acted openly, and there was significant mitigation. The breaches were not serious enough to warrant imprisonment or a suspended sentence. A fine of £100 each was appropriate.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] EWHC 3135 (QB)
Parties
Claimant: Wokingham Borough Council; Defendant: Dean Jules; Defendant: Candice Jules
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
24 November 2021
Procedural Posture
Contempt of Court Application Within Planning Enforcement Proceedings / Sentencing for Admitted Contempt of Court
Outcome
Defendants fined for contempt of court; no immediate order as to costs; further directions to be considered at adjourned hearing.
Legal Topics
Breach of Injunction, Planning Permission, Enforcement Notice, Sentencing for Contempt
Planning Law Civil Procedure Contempt of Court Breach of Injunction Planning Permission Enforcement Notice Sentencing for Contempt

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Wokingham Borough Council

Claimant

Dean Jules

Defendant

Candice Jules

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Contempt of Court Application Within Planning Enforcement Proceedings / Sentencing for Admitted Contempt of Court

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the defendants breached the terms of the injunction dated 3 April 2019
  2. 2 Appropriate sanction for contempt of court in the context of planning enforcement

Ratio Decidendi

The defendants admitted breaching the injunction, but had substantially purged their contempt, acted openly, and there was significant mitigation. The breaches were not serious enough to warrant imprisonment or a suspended sentence. A fine of £100 each was appropriate.

Court Disposition

Defendants fined for contempt of court; no immediate order as to costs; further directions to be considered at adjourned hearing.

Orders

  • Defendants to pay a fine of £100 each within 14 days.
  • No order as to costs at this stage; submissions to be heard at adjourned hearing.