Quantrell v TWA Logistics Ltd [2016] EWCA Civ 399 (22 April 2016)

Quantrell v TWA Logistics Ltd [2016] EWCA Civ 399 (22 April 2016)

The appellant failed to prove on the balance of probabilities that the accident was caused by inadequate training or breach of duty by the respondent; the evidence did not establish a causative link between any alleged training deficiency or seatbelt enforcement failure and the accident.

Citation
[2016] EWCA Civ 399
Parties
Appellant: Dean Quantrell; Respondent: TWA Logistics Ltd
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
22 April 2016
Procedural Posture
Personal Injury Appeal / Appeal From Trial Judgment on Liability
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Employer's Liability, Workplace Accidents, Training Adequacy, Seatbelt Enforcement, Burden of Proof
Tort Employment Law Health and Safety Employer's Liability Workplace Accidents Training Adequacy Seatbelt Enforcement Burden of Proof

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Dean Quantrell

Appellant

TWA Logistics Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Personal Injury Appeal / Appeal From Trial Judgment on Liability

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the respondent employer provided adequate training to the appellant for safe operation of the fork lift truck
  2. 2 Whether the respondent breached its duty regarding enforcement of seatbelt use
  3. 3 Whether the appellant proved on the balance of probabilities that the accident was caused by inadequate training or breach of duty by the respondent

Ratio Decidendi

The appellant failed to prove on the balance of probabilities that the accident was caused by inadequate training or breach of duty by the respondent; the evidence did not establish a causative link between any alleged training deficiency or seatbelt enforcement failure and the accident.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • No liability found against respondent
  • No damages awarded to appellant