Thomas, R v

Thomas, R v

The judge's refusal to appoint an intermediary for the entire trial or for the appellant's evidence was justified given the straightforward nature of the case, the adaptations made, and the appellant's demonstrated ability to participate. The appellant was fit to plead, and the sentence imposed was not manifestly excessive given the circumstances and proper consideration of mitigating factors.

Parties
Prosecution: Regina; Appellant: Dean Thomas
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
29 January 2020
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence
Outcome
appeal against conviction and sentence dismissed
Legal Topics
Causing Death by Careless Driving, Fitness to Plead, Appointment of Intermediary, Sentencing

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 15 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Regina

Prosecution

Dean Thomas

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence

  1. 1 Whether the trial judge erred in refusing to appoint an intermediary for the appellant throughout the trial
  2. 2 Whether the appellant was fit to plead and stand trial without an intermediary
  3. 3 Whether the judge erred in refusing to use the court's inherent powers to appoint an intermediary for the appellant's evidence

Ratio Decidendi

The judge's refusal to appoint an intermediary for the entire trial or for the appellant's evidence was justified given the straightforward nature of the case, the adaptations made, and the appellant's demonstrated ability to participate. The appellant was fit to plead, and the sentence imposed was not manifestly excessive given the circumstances and proper consideration of mitigating factors.

Court Disposition

appeal against conviction and sentence dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal against conviction dismissed
  • Leave to appeal sentence granted but appeal against sentence dismissed