Thomas-Ashley v Drum Housing Association Ltd
The appellant failed to demonstrate that the 'no animals' clause made it impossible or unreasonably difficult for her to enjoy the premises due to her disability, and even if discrimination was established, the landlord could not reasonably be expected to alter the lease terms given the head lessor's refusal and risk of forfeiture. The appeal was dismissed.
- Parties
- Appellant: Dee Thomas-Ashley; Respondent: Drum Housing Association Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 17 March 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Tenancy Agreements, Reasonable Adjustments, Disability Rights, Anti Discrimination Provisions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Dee Thomas-Ashley
Appellant
Drum Housing Association Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the 'no animals' clause in the tenancy agreement unlawfully discriminates against the appellant under section 24A and 24D of the Disability Discrimination Act 1995
- 2 Whether the landlord was under a duty to make reasonable adjustments to permit the appellant to keep a dog due to her disability
- 3 Whether the landlord's failure to change the lease terms was justified
Ratio Decidendi
The appellant failed to demonstrate that the 'no animals' clause made it impossible or unreasonably difficult for her to enjoy the premises due to her disability, and even if discrimination was established, the landlord could not reasonably be expected to alter the lease terms given the head lessor's refusal and risk of forfeiture. The appeal was dismissed.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed; possession order stands.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment