RS v LS & LMP [2018] EWHC 449 (Fam) (07 March 2018)
Default judgment in the sum of £107,361.07 is set aside due to failure to serve a response pack and LS's arguable defence regarding contractual interest; judgment is replaced with a reduced sum of £69,906 for principal debt, with LS permitted to defend the claim as to interest.
- Citation
- [2018] EWHC 449
- Parties
- Petitioner: RS; First Respondent: LS; Second Respondent: Levison Meltzer Pigott
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 07 March 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Application to Set Aside Default Judgment (debt Recovery Proceedings) / Post Judgment, Application to Set Aside Default Judgment
- Outcome
- Default judgment set aside in part; judgment varied and replaced with reduced sum; stay of execution granted.
- Legal Topics
- Default Judgment, Debt Recovery, Contractual Variation, Interest on Costs, Service of Process, Financial Remedies
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
RS
Petitioner
LS
First Respondent
Levison Meltzer Pigott
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application to Set Aside Default Judgment (debt Recovery Proceedings) / Post Judgment, Application to Set Aside Default Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether default judgment should be set aside due to failure to serve response pack
- 2 Whether LS has a real prospect of defending the claim regarding contractual interest
- 3 Whether delay in applying to set aside judgment bars relief
Ratio Decidendi
Default judgment in the sum of £107,361.07 is set aside due to failure to serve a response pack and LS's arguable defence regarding contractual interest; judgment is replaced with a reduced sum of £69,906 for principal debt, with LS permitted to defend the claim as to interest.
Court Disposition
Default judgment set aside in part; judgment varied and replaced with reduced sum; stay of execution granted.
Orders
- Default judgment of £107,361.07 set aside.
- Judgment entered for LMP in sum of £69,906.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment