Donald (Craijan Ltd) v Worcester Marine Windows Ltd [2013] EW Misc 41 (CC) (11 January 2013)

Donald (Craijan Ltd) v Worcester Marine Windows Ltd [2013] EW Misc 41 (CC) (11 January 2013)

The relationship was a commercial agency under the Regulations, the first Claimant was the contracting party, and the Defendant was not entitled to terminate the agency. The Defendant failed to discharge the burden of proof for lawful termination. Compensation is assessed based on statutory provisions and evidence of Claimant's contribution to Defendant's business.

Citation
[2013] EW Misc 41 (CC)
Parties
Claimant: Craig Donald; Claimant: CD Ltd; Defendant: Defendant Ltd
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
11 January 2013
Procedural Posture
Multi Track Trial / Judgment at Conclusion of Trial
Outcome
Judgment for the first Claimant against the Defendant
Legal Topics
Commercial Agency, Unlawful Termination, Statutory Compensation
Commercial Law Commercial Agency Unlawful Termination Statutory Compensation

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Craig Donald

Claimant

CD Ltd

Claimant

Defendant Ltd

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Multi Track Trial / Judgment at Conclusion of Trial

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Was the relationship a commercial agency under the Commercial Agents Council Directive Regulations 1993?
  2. 2 Who was the contracting party?
  3. 3 Was the termination lawful under the Regulations?

Ratio Decidendi

The relationship was a commercial agency under the Regulations, the first Claimant was the contracting party, and the Defendant was not entitled to terminate the agency. The Defendant failed to discharge the burden of proof for lawful termination. Compensation is assessed based on statutory provisions and evidence of Claimant's contribution to Defendant's business.

Court Disposition

Judgment for the first Claimant against the Defendant

Orders

  • Defendant to pay £59,576.47 to the first Claimant
  • Defendant to pay interest of £5,838.49