Hawkins v Darken (t/a Sawbridgeworth Motorcyles)
Mr Cowell was not employed under a contract personally to do work for Mr Darken because he was free to send a substitute to perform deliveries, failing the personal service test; therefore, the statutory exemption for small businesses applied and the Employment Tribunal lacked jurisdiction.
- Parties
- Applicant/respondent: Jamie Hawkins; Respondent/appellant: Nigel Darken t/a Sawbridgeworth Motorcycles
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 13 December 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Definition of Employee, Contract Personally to Do Work, Statutory Exemption for Small Businesses
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jamie Hawkins
Applicant/respondent
Nigel Darken t/a Sawbridgeworth Motorcycles
Respondent/appellant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Mr Cowell was an employee under section 68(1) of the Disability Discrimination Act 1995
- 2 Whether the Employment Tribunal had jurisdiction based on the number of employees
Ratio Decidendi
Mr Cowell was not employed under a contract personally to do work for Mr Darken because he was free to send a substitute to perform deliveries, failing the personal service test; therefore, the statutory exemption for small businesses applied and the Employment Tribunal lacked jurisdiction.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Order of the Employment Appeal Tribunal set aside
- Decision of the Employment Tribunal restored
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment