[2011] EWHC 1712 (Ch)
Delta's use of Schütz trade marks on cages of cross-bottled IBCs constitutes trade mark infringement in relation to both the bottle and the IBC as a whole, as the average end-user is likely to perceive the marks as indicating the entire IBC is a Schütz product. Disclaimers used by Delta were insufficient to prevent this perception. The conduct also amounts to passing off, as it misleads end-users into attributing the IBC or its components to Schütz, exposing Schütz to risk of reputational damage in the event of product failure.
- Parties
- Claimant: Schütz (U.K.) Limited; Claimant: Schütz GmbH & Co. KGaA; Defendant: Delta Containers Limited; Defendant: Protechna S.A.
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 05 July 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Intellectual Property (trade Mark and Passing Off) / Judgment After Liability Only Trial
- Outcome
- Judgment for the claimants (Schütz); trade mark infringement and passing off established.
- Legal Topics
- Trade Mark Infringement, Passing Off, Composite Goods, Exhaustion of Rights, Average Consumer Test, Misrepresentation, Goodwill, Remedies
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Schütz (U.K.) Limited
Claimant
Schütz GmbH & Co. KGaA
Claimant
Delta Containers Limited
Defendant
Protechna S.A.
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Intellectual Property (trade Mark and Passing Off) / Judgment After Liability Only Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Delta's use of Schütz trade marks on cages of cross-bottled IBCs constitutes trade mark infringement in relation to the bottle and IBC as a whole
- 2 Whether Delta's conduct amounts to passing off by misrepresentation to end-users or fillers
- 3 Whether disclaimers used by Delta are sufficient to negate infringement or passing off
Ratio Decidendi
Delta's use of Schütz trade marks on cages of cross-bottled IBCs constitutes trade mark infringement in relation to both the bottle and the IBC as a whole, as the average end-user is likely to perceive the marks as indicating the entire IBC is a Schütz product. Disclaimers used by Delta were insufficient to prevent this perception. The conduct also amounts to passing off, as it misleads end-users into attributing the IBC or its components to Schütz, exposing Schütz to risk of reputational damage in the event of product failure.
Court Disposition
Judgment for the claimants (Schütz); trade mark infringement and passing off established.
Orders
- Final injunction to issue restraining Delta from further infringement and passing off as and when patent rights no longer bar such activity.
- Court to hear submissions on the appropriate form of injunction and case management for damages.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment