Aurora Developments Ltd & Ors v Delta Holdings Ltd & Ors
Contemporaneous documentary evidence established beyond doubt that defendants made knowingly false representations to claimants regarding property prices and availability, executed a valid Deed creating a trust, and arranged a sham IPS loan; defences lacked any reasonable prospect of success.
- Parties
- Claimant: Aurora Developments Limited; Claimant: AMK Estates Limited; Claimant: Alexey Sakun; Claimant: PSP-Farman Holding SA; Claimant: Gelaneco Holdings Limited; Claimant: Lexafin Business S.A.; Claimant: Blooming Market Investments Limited; Defendant: Delta Holdings Limited; Defendant: Mr Eli Cohen; Defendant: Mr Lionel Cohen; Defendant: Mr Christopher Robin Henschel; Defendant: Mr Mark Greaves; Defendant: The Aurora Property Group Limited; Defendant: International Property Solutions Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 10 May 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Summary Judgment Application
- Outcome
- Summary judgment granted for claimants on three core issues; relevant parts of defences struck out.
- Legal Topics
- Fraudulent Misrepresentation, Deed Validity, Sham Transaction, Nominee Arrangements, Joint Tortfeasor Liability
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Aurora Developments Limited
Claimant
AMK Estates Limited
Claimant
Alexey Sakun
Claimant
PSP-Farman Holding SA
Claimant
Gelaneco Holdings Limited
Claimant
Lexafin Business S.A.
Claimant
Blooming Market Investments Limited
Claimant
Delta Holdings Limited
Defendant
Mr Eli Cohen
Defendant
Mr Lionel Cohen
Defendant
Mr Christopher Robin Henschel
Defendant
Mr Mark Greaves
Defendant
The Aurora Property Group Limited
Defendant
International Property Solutions Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Summary Judgment Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether defendants fraudulently misrepresented property prices and availability to investors
- 2 Whether the Deed executed on 2 October 2014 was valid and binding
- 3 Whether the IPS loan was a sham transaction
Ratio Decidendi
Contemporaneous documentary evidence established beyond doubt that defendants made knowingly false representations to claimants regarding property prices and availability, executed a valid Deed creating a trust, and arranged a sham IPS loan; defences lacked any reasonable prospect of success.
Court Disposition
Summary judgment granted for claimants on three core issues; relevant parts of defences struck out.
Orders
- Declaration that defendants made fraudulent misrepresentations to claimants regarding property prices and availability.
- Declaration that Deed executed on 2 October 2014 is valid and binding.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment