Deman v Association Of University Teachers [2002] EWCA Civ 426 (1 March 2002)

Deman v Association Of University Teachers [2002] EWCA Civ 426 (1 March 2002)

The application was refused because the order appealed against was of limited duration and had expired, the appeal was academic, there was no evidence of bias, and no merit in any of the applicant's grounds.

Citation
[2002] EWCA Civ 426
Parties
Applicant: Deman; Respondent: Association of University Teachers
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
01 March 2002
Procedural Posture
Application for Permission to Appeal and Extension of Time / Court of Appeal (civil Division) Permission to Appeal
Outcome
Application refused
Legal Topics
Race Discrimination, Sex Discrimination, Victimisation, Stay of Proceedings, Bias, Human Rights Act, Procedural Fairness
Employment Law Discrimination Law Race Discrimination Sex Discrimination Victimisation Stay of Proceedings Bias Human Rights Act +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Deman

Applicant

Association of University Teachers

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Application for Permission to Appeal and Extension of Time / Court of Appeal (civil Division) Permission to Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Employment Appeal Tribunal erred in upholding a stay of proceedings by the Employment Tribunal
  2. 2 Whether there was bias in the Employment Tribunal's decision
  3. 3 Whether the applicant was denied a fair hearing under the Human Rights Act

Ratio Decidendi

The application was refused because the order appealed against was of limited duration and had expired, the appeal was academic, there was no evidence of bias, and no merit in any of the applicant's grounds.

Court Disposition

Application refused

Orders

  • Permission to appeal refused