Deman v Association of University Teachers [2003] EWCA Civ 329 (14 March 2003)
The Employment Tribunal's decision was deficient as it failed to provide adequate reasons for not drawing inferences of discrimination from the facts found, did not properly address unconscious discrimination, and thus fell below the required standard for reasoned decisions in discrimination cases.
- Citation
- [2003] EWCA Civ 329
- Parties
- Appellant: DEMAN; Respondent: ASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY TEACHERS
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 14 March 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal From Employment Appeal Tribunal
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; Employment Tribunal decision set aside; case remitted for rehearing before a differently constituted Tribunal.
- Legal Topics
- Race Discrimination, Victimisation, Employment Tribunal Procedure, Reasons for Decision, Jurisdiction
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
DEMAN
Appellant
ASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY TEACHERS
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal From Employment Appeal Tribunal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Employment Tribunal gave adequate reasons for its decision
- 2 Whether the Employment Tribunal erred in law in holding there was no evidence from which an inference of racial discrimination or victimisation could be drawn
- 3 Whether the Employment Tribunal failed to consider unconscious racial discrimination or victimisation
Ratio Decidendi
The Employment Tribunal's decision was deficient as it failed to provide adequate reasons for not drawing inferences of discrimination from the facts found, did not properly address unconscious discrimination, and thus fell below the required standard for reasoned decisions in discrimination cases.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; Employment Tribunal decision set aside; case remitted for rehearing before a differently constituted Tribunal.
Orders
- Appellant to set out allegations and evidence within 28 days; respondent to reply within 28 days thereafter.
- Case management conference to be held before Tribunal Chairman.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment