Hussain v Salford City Council [2006] EWLands LCA_7_2006 (10 August 2006)
A leaseholder with an unexpired term exceeding three years is entitled to compensation under section 584A of the Housing Act 1985 when a demolition order is made affecting the premises, as the statutory definitions of 'owner' and 'premises' encompass such an interest.
- Citation
- [2006] EWLands LCA_7_2006
- Parties
- Claimant: Imtiaz Hussain; Compensating Authority: Salford City Council
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 10 August 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Compensation Claim Under Demolition Order / Determination Under Written Representations Procedure
- Outcome
- claim allowed
- Legal Topics
- Demolition Order, Compensation Entitlement, Leasehold Interest, Statutory Interpretation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Imtiaz Hussain
Claimant
Salford City Council
Compensating Authority
Procedural Posture
Compensation Claim Under Demolition Order / Determination Under Written Representations Procedure
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a leaseholder with an unexpired term exceeding three years is entitled to compensation under section 584A of the Housing Act 1985 when a demolition order is made affecting the premises.
Ratio Decidendi
A leaseholder with an unexpired term exceeding three years is entitled to compensation under section 584A of the Housing Act 1985 when a demolition order is made affecting the premises, as the statutory definitions of 'owner' and 'premises' encompass such an interest.
Court Disposition
claim allowed
Orders
- Compensation in the sum of £110,500 plus surveyors' and legal fees to be paid to the claimant, with fees to be quantified and notified to the Tribunal within 28 days.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment