Oades & Anor v Eke [2004] EWLands RA_17_2003 (22 March 2004)
The chalets are not caravans within the statutory definition because they are not practically capable of being moved from one place to another; therefore, each must be entered as a single hereditament and not merged.
- Citation
- [2004] EWLands RA_17_2003
- Parties
- Appellants: Mr & Mrs C Oades; Respondent: Dennis Eke
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 22 March 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Hereditament, Caravan Definition, Non Domestic Rating, Caravan Sites and Control of Development Act 1960, Non Domestic Rating (caravan Sites) Regulations 1990
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Parties
Mr & Mrs C Oades
Appellants
Dennis Eke
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether holiday chalets are caravans within the statutory definition
- 2 Whether the park should be assessed as a single hereditament under Non-Domestic Rating (Caravan Sites) Regulations 1990
Ratio Decidendi
The chalets are not caravans within the statutory definition because they are not practically capable of being moved from one place to another; therefore, each must be entered as a single hereditament and not merged.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- No merged assessment; individual assessments remain.
- No award as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment