Dennis Howard v The Information Commissioner
The Tribunal has no jurisdiction to review or supervise the substantive outcome of a data protection complaint once the Information Commissioner has concluded their investigation; section 166 DPA 2018 provides only a procedural remedy for inaction, not a right of appeal against the outcome.
- Parties
- Applicant: Dennis Howard; Respondent: The Information Commissioner
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 22 October 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Tribunal Appeal / Strike Out Application
- Outcome
- Appeal struck out
- Legal Topics
- Right to Be Forgotten, Jurisdiction of Tribunal, Section 166 Data Protection Act 2018, Procedural Remedies
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Dennis Howard
Applicant
The Information Commissioner
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Tribunal Appeal / Strike Out Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Tribunal has jurisdiction to review the outcome of a data protection complaint under section 166 Data Protection Act 2018
- 2 Whether the application discloses any cause of action within the Tribunal's statutory powers
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal has no jurisdiction to review or supervise the substantive outcome of a data protection complaint once the Information Commissioner has concluded their investigation; section 166 DPA 2018 provides only a procedural remedy for inaction, not a right of appeal against the outcome.
Court Disposition
Appeal struck out
Orders
- The Applicant’s application is granted; the appeal is struck out under Rule 8(2)(a) and Rule 8(3)(c) as an application that cannot be made to this Tribunal and with no prospect of success.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment