Derbyshire Waste Ltd. v Blewett
Article 8(b) of the Landfill Directive is part of UK law via the 1994 Regulations implementing the Waste Framework Directive, but it does not require that planning permission for landfill be granted only if the proposal is the BPEO. The Council's consideration of BPEO was so seriously flawed as to render its decision unlawful. The court should not exercise its discretion to refuse relief, as it is not possible to say the outcome would have been the same had BPEO been properly considered.
- Parties
- Appellant: Derbyshire Waste Limited; Respondent: John Blewett; Intervener: The Secretary of State for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 November 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review (planning Permission) / Appeal From Administrative Court to Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Waste Management, Landfill Directive, Waste Framework Directive, Best Practicable Environmental Option (bpeo), Judicial Review, Planning Permission, Implementation of EU Directives
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Derbyshire Waste Limited
Appellant
John Blewett
Respondent
The Secretary of State for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Intervener
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review (planning Permission) / Appeal From Administrative Court to Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Article 8(b) of the Landfill Directive is part of UK law and its effect on planning permission for landfill
- 2 Whether compliance with BPEO as incorporated in Waste Strategy 2000 is a pre-condition for granting planning permission for landfill
- 3 Whether the Council's consideration of BPEO was so flawed as to be unlawful
Ratio Decidendi
Article 8(b) of the Landfill Directive is part of UK law via the 1994 Regulations implementing the Waste Framework Directive, but it does not require that planning permission for landfill be granted only if the proposal is the BPEO. The Council's consideration of BPEO was so seriously flawed as to render its decision unlawful. The court should not exercise its discretion to refuse relief, as it is not possible to say the outcome would have been the same had BPEO been properly considered.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appellant to pay the respondent’s costs to be assessed if not agreed
- Detailed assessment of the Legal Service Commission funding of the respondent’s residual costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment