Barron, R. v
The trial was not rendered fundamentally unfair by the cumulative effect of admitted evidence, loss of exhibits, or summing up errors. All evidence was properly admitted, the judge's rulings were correct, and the appellant received a fair trial. The conviction is safe.
- Parties
- Respondent: THE QUEEN; Appellant: DEREK BARRON
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 21 December 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Conviction
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Murder, Bad Character Evidence, Abuse of Process, Fair Trial, Admissibility of Evidence, Summation Errors
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
THE QUEEN
Respondent
DEREK BARRON
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Conviction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the admission of bad character evidence rendered the trial unfair
- 2 Whether the loss of key exhibits and admission of hearsay evidence constituted abuse of process
- 3 Whether errors in the judge's summing up made the conviction unsafe
Ratio Decidendi
The trial was not rendered fundamentally unfair by the cumulative effect of admitted evidence, loss of exhibits, or summing up errors. All evidence was properly admitted, the judge's rulings were correct, and the appellant received a fair trial. The conviction is safe.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- conviction upheld
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment