Derek Moss v The Royal Borough of Kingston-Upon-Thames & Anor
The High Court is not bound by the FTT's certification and must itself determine whether the conduct amounts to contempt before considering sanction. The process did not breach the applicant's Article 6 rights as the applicant was not improperly burdened with enforcement and had the opportunity to participate fully.
- Parties
- Appellant: Derek Moss; First Respondent: The Royal Borough of Kingston-upon-Thames; Second Respondent: The Information Commissioner
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 October 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court to Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Contempt of Court, Freedom of Information, Tribunal Procedure, Article 6 ECHR, Certification of Offences
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Derek Moss
Appellant
The Royal Borough of Kingston-upon-Thames
First Respondent
The Information Commissioner
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court to Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the High Court has jurisdiction to determine if an omission certified by the FTT amounts to contempt or is limited to sanction only
- 2 Whether the process breached the applicant's rights under Article 6 ECHR
Ratio Decidendi
The High Court is not bound by the FTT's certification and must itself determine whether the conduct amounts to contempt before considering sanction. The process did not breach the applicant's Article 6 rights as the applicant was not improperly burdened with enforcement and had the opportunity to participate fully.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment