Derek Moss v The Royal Borough of Kingston-Upon-Thames & Anor

Derek Moss v The Royal Borough of Kingston-Upon-Thames & Anor

The High Court is not bound by the FTT's certification and must itself determine whether the conduct amounts to contempt before considering sanction. The process did not breach the applicant's Article 6 rights as the applicant was not improperly burdened with enforcement and had the opportunity to participate fully.

Parties
Appellant: Derek Moss; First Respondent: The Royal Borough of Kingston-upon-Thames; Second Respondent: The Information Commissioner
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
11 October 2024
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court to Court of Appeal
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Contempt of Court, Freedom of Information, Tribunal Procedure, Article 6 ECHR, Certification of Offences

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 13 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Derek Moss

Appellant

The Royal Borough of Kingston-upon-Thames

First Respondent

The Information Commissioner

Second Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court to Court of Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the High Court has jurisdiction to determine if an omission certified by the FTT amounts to contempt or is limited to sanction only
  2. 2 Whether the process breached the applicant's rights under Article 6 ECHR

Ratio Decidendi

The High Court is not bound by the FTT's certification and must itself determine whether the conduct amounts to contempt before considering sanction. The process did not breach the applicant's Article 6 rights as the applicant was not improperly burdened with enforcement and had the opportunity to participate fully.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed