Moss v Information Commissioner [2020] EWCA Civ 580 (15 May 2020)
The principle of open justice prevails unless a derogation is strictly necessary. The appellant failed to demonstrate that anonymity was necessary to protect his Article 8 or 6 rights, and the risk to his privacy was negligible. The tribunal's refusal to grant anonymity was lawful and proportionate.
- Citation
- [2020] EWCA Civ 580
- Parties
- Appellant: Derek Moss; Respondent: Information Commissioner
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 15 May 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Upper Tribunal to Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Open Justice, Anonymity Orders, Article 8 ECHR, Article 10 ECHR, Article 6 ECHR, Freedom of Information, Balancing Exercise
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Derek Moss
Appellant
Information Commissioner
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Upper Tribunal to Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the refusal to grant anonymity to the appellant was lawful under the balancing of ECHR rights and the principle of open justice
- 2 Whether the refusal breached the appellant's Article 6 (fair trial) and Article 8 (privacy) rights
Ratio Decidendi
The principle of open justice prevails unless a derogation is strictly necessary. The appellant failed to demonstrate that anonymity was necessary to protect his Article 8 or 6 rights, and the risk to his privacy was negligible. The tribunal's refusal to grant anonymity was lawful and proportionate.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Application for anonymity order dismissed
- Temporary anonymity order discharged
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment