Moss v Information Commissioner [2020] EWCA Civ 580 (15 May 2020)

Moss v Information Commissioner [2020] EWCA Civ 580 (15 May 2020)

The principle of open justice prevails unless a derogation is strictly necessary. The appellant failed to demonstrate that anonymity was necessary to protect his Article 8 or 6 rights, and the risk to his privacy was negligible. The tribunal's refusal to grant anonymity was lawful and proportionate.

Citation
[2020] EWCA Civ 580
Parties
Appellant: Derek Moss; Respondent: Information Commissioner
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
15 May 2020
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Upper Tribunal to Court of Appeal
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Open Justice, Anonymity Orders, Article 8 ECHR, Article 10 ECHR, Article 6 ECHR, Freedom of Information, Balancing Exercise

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 15 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Derek Moss

Appellant

Information Commissioner

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From Upper Tribunal to Court of Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the refusal to grant anonymity to the appellant was lawful under the balancing of ECHR rights and the principle of open justice
  2. 2 Whether the refusal breached the appellant's Article 6 (fair trial) and Article 8 (privacy) rights

Ratio Decidendi

The principle of open justice prevails unless a derogation is strictly necessary. The appellant failed to demonstrate that anonymity was necessary to protect his Article 8 or 6 rights, and the risk to his privacy was negligible. The tribunal's refusal to grant anonymity was lawful and proportionate.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Application for anonymity order dismissed
  • Temporary anonymity order discharged