Moss v Information Commissioner
The refusal to grant an anonymity order was lawful as the principle of open justice prevailed over the appellant's Article 8 and 6 rights. There was no appreciable risk to the appellant's privacy, and the necessity threshold for derogation from open justice was not met. The appellant's arguments did not justify a departure from the general rule of publicity in court proceedings.
- Parties
- Appellant: Derek Moss; Respondent: Information Commissioner
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 15 May 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Upper Tribunal to Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Open Justice, Anonymity Orders, Article 8 ECHR, Article 10 ECHR, Article 6 ECHR, Freedom of Information
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Derek Moss
Appellant
Information Commissioner
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Upper Tribunal to Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the refusal to grant an anonymity order to the appellant was lawful under the balancing of ECHR rights and the principle of open justice
- 2 Whether the refusal breached the appellant's Article 6(1) right to a fair hearing
- 3 Whether the refusal breached the appellant's Article 8 right to privacy
Ratio Decidendi
The refusal to grant an anonymity order was lawful as the principle of open justice prevailed over the appellant's Article 8 and 6 rights. There was no appreciable risk to the appellant's privacy, and the necessity threshold for derogation from open justice was not met. The appellant's arguments did not justify a departure from the general rule of publicity in court proceedings.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Application for anonymity order dismissed
- Temporary anonymity order discharged
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment