Derek Speight v The Information Commissioner & Anor
The Tribunal found no risk of identifying any living person from disclosure of the withheld report numbers. The evidence showed that only the original reporter can access the status of their report, and others cannot use report numbers to identify individuals. The exemption under section 40(2) FOIA is not satisfied; the withheld information does not constitute personal data.
- Parties
- Appellant: Derek Speight; First Respondent: The Information Commissioner; Second Respondent: The Chief Constable of the Sussex Police
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 06 March 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Freedom of Information Act (foia), Personal Data, Section 40(2) FOIA, Data Protection Act 2018, UK GDPR
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Derek Speight
Appellant
The Information Commissioner
First Respondent
The Chief Constable of the Sussex Police
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the withheld information constitutes personal data under section 40(2) FOIA
- 2 Whether disclosure would contravene data protection principles
- 3 Whether individuals can be identified from the withheld information
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found no risk of identifying any living person from disclosure of the withheld report numbers. The evidence showed that only the original reporter can access the status of their report, and others cannot use report numbers to identify individuals. The exemption under section 40(2) FOIA is not satisfied; the withheld information does not constitute personal data.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- The Sussex Police must disclose the withheld information to the Appellant within 28 days of the date of this Judgment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment