Wright, R v [2000] EWCA Crim 38 (15th May, 2000)

Wright, R v [2000] EWCA Crim 38 (15th May, 2000)

The jury's verdicts were not inconsistent as they could reasonably find assault without racial aggravation based on the evidence. Cross-examination regarding dismissal for racial comments was permissible since the appellant put his character in issue, and the admission of such evidence did not deprive him of a fair...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2000] EWCA Crim 38
Parties
Appellant: Derek Wright; Complainant: Peter Edwards; Respondent: The Crown
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment After Leave to Appeal Granted
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Assault Occasioning Actual Bodily Harm, Racially Aggravated Assault, Bad Character Evidence, Jury Verdict Consistency, Cross Examination
Criminal Law Assault Occasioning Actual Bodily Harm Racially Aggravated Assault Bad Character Evidence Jury Verdict Consistency Cross Examination

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Derek Wright

Appellant

Peter Edwards

Complainant

The Crown

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Judgment After Leave to Appeal Granted

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the jury's verdicts on assault and racially aggravated assault were inconsistent
  2. 2 Whether cross-examination regarding dismissal for racial comments was permissible
  3. 3 Whether admission of dismissal evidence deprived appellant of a fair trial

Ratio Decidendi

The jury's verdicts were not inconsistent as they could reasonably find assault without racial aggravation based on the evidence. Cross-examination regarding dismissal for racial comments was permissible since the appellant put his character in issue, and the admission of such evidence did not deprive him of a fair trial.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • conviction for assault occasioning actual bodily harm upheld
  • sentence of 120 hours Community Service, £150 compensation, and 3-year bind over confirmed