Mozafarian Jewellers LLC v Designed By Josh Ltd [2019] EWHC 2764 (Ch) (25 September 2019)
The Claimant failed to establish a serious issue to be tried on procurement of breach of contract due to the wide contractual discretion of the bank; while malicious falsehood and breach of contract claims may be arguable, the balance of convenience does not favour granting mandatory interlocutory relief, as the prejudice to the Defendant outweighs that to the Claimant and the relief sought is not closely connected to the alleged harm.
- Citation
- [2019] EWHC 2764 (Ch)
- Parties
- Claimant: Mozafarian Jewellers LLC; Defendant: Designed by Josh Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 25 September 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Interlocutory Application (injunction) in Civil Proceedings / Application for Interim Mandatory Injunction Prior to Service of Particulars of Claim
- Outcome
- Application refused
- Legal Topics
- Interim Injunctions, Mandatory Injunctions, Breach of Contract, Malicious Falsehood, Procurement of Breach of Contract, Disclosure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mozafarian Jewellers LLC
Claimant
Designed by Josh Ltd
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application (injunction) in Civil Proceedings / Application for Interim Mandatory Injunction Prior to Service of Particulars of Claim
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Claimant is entitled to a mandatory interlocutory injunction requiring the Defendant to provide information, documents, and use best endeavours to lift a bank account freeze
- 2 Whether there is a serious issue to be tried on the pleaded causes of action (procurement of breach of contract, malicious falsehood, breach of contract)
- 3 Whether the balance of convenience favours granting the mandatory injunction
Ratio Decidendi
The Claimant failed to establish a serious issue to be tried on procurement of breach of contract due to the wide contractual discretion of the bank; while malicious falsehood and breach of contract claims may be arguable, the balance of convenience does not favour granting mandatory interlocutory relief, as the prejudice to the Defendant outweighs that to the Claimant and the relief sought is not closely connected to the alleged harm.
Court Disposition
Application refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment