Bray v Deutsche Bank AG (Rev. 1) [2009] EWHC 1356 (QB) (18 June 2009)
The Claimant's case against X and Y on the publication issue has a real prospect of success and is fit for trial; the plea of malice against A has no real prospect of success and summary judgment is granted on that issue.
- Citation
- [2009] EWHC 1356 (QB)
- Parties
- Claimant: Stuart Bray; Defendant: Deutsche Bank AG
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 18 June 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Libel Action / Interlocutory Applications for Summary Judgment and Strike Out
- Outcome
- Defendant's second application for summary judgment on the whole claim dismissed; Defendant's application for summary judgment on malice against A succeeds.
- Legal Topics
- Libel, Summary Judgment, Malice, Qualified Privilege, Abuse of Process
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Stuart Bray
Claimant
Deutsche Bank AG
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Libel Action / Interlocutory Applications for Summary Judgment and Strike Out
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Claimant has a real prospect of success on the publication issue against X and Y
- 2 Whether the plea of malice against A has a real prospect of success
- 3 Whether the Defendant's second application for summary judgment constitutes abuse of process
Ratio Decidendi
The Claimant's case against X and Y on the publication issue has a real prospect of success and is fit for trial; the plea of malice against A has no real prospect of success and summary judgment is granted on that issue.
Court Disposition
Defendant's second application for summary judgment on the whole claim dismissed; Defendant's application for summary judgment on malice against A succeeds.
Orders
- Claimant's case against X and Y to proceed to trial
- Summary judgment granted against Claimant on plea of malice relating to A
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment