United Pan-Europe Communications N.V v Deutsche Bank AG [2000] EWCA Civ 166 (19 May 2000)
UPC has a seriously arguable case for misuse of confidential information and breach of fiduciary duty by DB, entitling UPC to a proprietary remedy; damages are inadequate, and delay does not bar relief. Interim injunction should be granted pending trial.
- Citation
- [2000] EWCA Civ 166
- Parties
- Claimant: United Pan-Europe Holdings NV; Defendant: Deutsche Bank AG; Third Party: TeleColumbus GmbH
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 19 May 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Constructive Trust, Breach of Confidence, Fiduciary Duty, Interim Injunction, Proprietary Remedy
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
United Pan-Europe Holdings NV
Claimant
Deutsche Bank AG
Defendant
TeleColumbus GmbH
Third Party
Procedural Posture
Civil / Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether DB misused confidential information obtained from UPC
- 2 Whether DB breached a fiduciary duty of loyalty owed to UPC
- 3 Whether UPC is entitled to a proprietary remedy (constructive trust) over shares in TC
Ratio Decidendi
UPC has a seriously arguable case for misuse of confidential information and breach of fiduciary duty by DB, entitling UPC to a proprietary remedy; damages are inadequate, and delay does not bar relief. Interim injunction should be granted pending trial.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Interim injunction granted in form sought by notice of appeal
- Paragraphs 1 and 2 of Jacob J's order set aside
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment