Cummings, R. v

Cummings, R. v

The sentence of 3 years and 7 months' imprisonment was appropriate given the medium culpability, the presence of a weapon, threat of violence, psychological harm to the victim, and significant business loss. The Recorder was entitled to reject the argument that harm was minimal.

Parties
Prosecutor: Regina; Appellant: Devina Caroline Cummings
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
28 March 2017
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Sentence
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Robbery, Sentencing, Joint Enterprise, Psychological Harm, Categorisation of Harm
Criminal Law Robbery Sentencing Joint Enterprise Psychological Harm Categorisation of Harm

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Regina

Prosecutor

Devina Caroline Cummings

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the sentence imposed for robbery was appropriate given the categorisation of harm and culpability
  2. 2 Whether the Recorder erred in assessing psychological harm and business loss

Ratio Decidendi

The sentence of 3 years and 7 months' imprisonment was appropriate given the medium culpability, the presence of a weapon, threat of violence, psychological harm to the victim, and significant business loss. The Recorder was entitled to reject the argument that harm was minimal.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The appeal against sentence is refused.