Tanks and Vessels Industries Ltd v Devon Cider Company Ltd [2009] EWHC 1360 (Ch) (17 June 2009)
TVI retained title to both the Palletiser and the Vessels until payment; Devon Cider's continued possession after expiry of the hire period (Palletiser) and after demand (Vessels) constituted conversion. The Palletiser agreement was a hire, not hire-purchase, with no agreed residual value. The Vessels were supplied on terms that title would not pass until payment. TVI is entitled to an order for delivery up of both items, but Devon Cider may alternatively pay damages assessed at market value as of the date of conversion.
- Citation
- [2009] EWHC 1360 (Ch)
- Parties
- Claimant: Tanks and Vessels Industries Limited; Defendant: Devon Cider Company Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 17 June 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Trial (claim and Counterclaim) / Judgment After Trial
- Outcome
- Claim allowed in part; counterclaim dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Conversion, Sale of Goods, Retention of Title, Bailment, Damages, Hire Agreements
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Tanks and Vessels Industries Limited
Claimant
Devon Cider Company Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Trial (claim and Counterclaim) / Judgment After Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether TVI retained title to the Palletiser and Vessels supplied to DCC/Devon Cider
- 2 Whether Devon Cider's retention of the Palletiser and Vessels constituted conversion under the Torts (Interference with Goods) Act 1977
- 3 Whether the agreement for the Palletiser was a hire or hire-purchase agreement
Ratio Decidendi
TVI retained title to both the Palletiser and the Vessels until payment; Devon Cider's continued possession after expiry of the hire period (Palletiser) and after demand (Vessels) constituted conversion. The Palletiser agreement was a hire, not hire-purchase, with no agreed residual value. The Vessels were supplied on terms that title would not pass until payment. TVI is entitled to an order for delivery up of both items, but Devon Cider may alternatively pay damages assessed at market value as of the date of conversion.
Court Disposition
Claim allowed in part; counterclaim dismissed.
Orders
- Order for delivery up of the Palletiser and Vessels to TVI, with alternative for Devon Cider to pay damages by reference to market value at date of conversion (£12,000 for Palletiser as at September 2007; £72,000 for Vessels as at 18 January 2008).
- Consequential damages for loss of use of the Palletiser not awarded in addition to market value damages.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment