Devon County Council v M & Ors [2022] EWFC 217 (B) (19 August 2022)
The court found, on the balance of probabilities, that the parents did physically discipline the children at times, but the evidence did not establish that such discipline was abusive or excessive. The court considered the cultural context, the lack of physical marks, the nature of the children's disclosures, and the credibility of witnesses. The allegations of influencing the children and causing significant emotional harm were not substantiated. The court was not satisfied that the use of a stick or any implement was proved, nor that the parents' actions amounted to significant harm justifying further intervention.
- Citation
- [2022] EWFC 217 (B)
- Parties
- Applicant: Devon County Council; First Respondent: M; Second Respondent: F; Third, Fourth and Fifth Respondents: A, B and C (through their Children's Guardian)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 19 August 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Public Law Children Proceedings (fact Finding) / Fact Finding Judgment
- Outcome
- Allegations of physical abuse and excessive chastisement not proved to the threshold of significant harm; children not found to have suffered significant emotional harm as alleged; no findings of intentional or unintentional influencing of children by parents.
- Legal Topics
- Physical Abuse, Excessive Chastisement, Cultural Context in Child Protection, Burden and Standard of Proof, Credibility of Witnesses, Removal of Children, Translation and Interpretation in Court
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Devon County Council
Applicant
M
First Respondent
F
Second Respondent
A, B and C (through their Children's Guardian)
Third, Fourth and Fifth Respondents
Procedural Posture
Public Law Children Proceedings (fact Finding) / Fact Finding Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the parents physically abused or excessively chastised the children
- 2 Whether the parents influenced the children to change their accounts or not disclose to authorities
- 3 Whether the making of allegations by the children evidences significant emotional harm
Ratio Decidendi
The court found, on the balance of probabilities, that the parents did physically discipline the children at times, but the evidence did not establish that such discipline was abusive or excessive. The court considered the cultural context, the lack of physical marks, the nature of the children's disclosures, and the credibility of witnesses. The allegations of influencing the children and causing significant emotional harm were not substantiated. The court was not satisfied that the use of a stick or any implement was proved, nor that the parents' actions amounted to significant harm justifying further intervention.
Court Disposition
Allegations of physical abuse and excessive chastisement not proved to the threshold of significant harm; children not found to have suffered significant emotional harm as alleged; no findings of intentional or unintentional influencing of children by parents.
Orders
- No findings of physical abuse or excessive chastisement beyond minimal physical discipline.
- No findings of parental influencing of children to change accounts or conceal abuse.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment