Gould & Anor, R (on the application of) v Devon County Council [2025] EWHC 96 (Admin) (24 January 2025)
The Defendant was not under a statutory duty to provide the North Devon Link Service and was entitled to close it after considering relevant statutory duties and policies. The Claimants failed to prove the Defendant misunderstood the Service's role or acted irrationally. Even if there was a procedural failure, section 31(2A) of the Senior Courts Act 1981 applies, and it is highly likely the outcome would not have been substantially different.
- Citation
- [2025] EWHC 96 (Admin)
- Parties
- Claimant: Sonia Gould; Claimant: Alice Jeffery; Defendant: Devon County Council; Interested Party: Devon Partnership NHS Trust
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 24 January 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Statutory Duties, Care Act 2014, National Health Service Act 2006, Local Government and Public Involvement in Health Act 2007, Suicide Prevention Policy, Rationality in Decision Making, Mandatory Relevant Considerations
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sonia Gould
Claimant
Alice Jeffery
Claimant
Devon County Council
Defendant
Devon Partnership NHS Trust
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Devon County Council failed to take account of statutory duties under the Care Act 2014 and NHS Act 2006 when deciding to close the North Devon Link Service
- 2 Whether failure to consider relevant policies and strategies (including suicide prevention and integrated care strategy) rendered the decision unlawful
- 3 Whether the decision was irrational or outside the range of rational decisions open to the council
Ratio Decidendi
The Defendant was not under a statutory duty to provide the North Devon Link Service and was entitled to close it after considering relevant statutory duties and policies. The Claimants failed to prove the Defendant misunderstood the Service's role or acted irrationally. Even if there was a procedural failure, section 31(2A) of the Senior Courts Act 1981 applies, and it is highly likely the outcome would not have been substantially different.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment