L (by her litigation friend N) v Devon County Council
Regulation 20 must be read with Regulation 22; the plain meaning of 'notify' in Regulation 20(10) in the context of the statutory scheme means that the local authority must notify the relevant people of the substance of the proposed way forward, including a draft of the proposed amendments, within four weeks of the review meeting. The Regulations impose a strict timetable for notifying proposed amendments, and the absence of an express time limit does not justify a flexible or resource-dependent approach.
- Parties
- First Claimant: L (by her litigation friend N); Second Claimant: M (by her litigation friend O); Third Claimant: P (by his litigation friend Q); Defendant: Devon County Council
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 08 March 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Judgment After Substantive Hearing
- Outcome
- Judicial review allowed
- Legal Topics
- Statutory Interpretation, Education Health and Care Plans, Time Limits in Administrative Processes, Children and Families Act 2014, Special Educational Needs and Disability Regulations 2014
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
L (by her litigation friend N)
First Claimant
M (by her litigation friend O)
Second Claimant
P (by his litigation friend Q)
Third Claimant
Devon County Council
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Judgment After Substantive Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Special Educational Needs and Disability Regulations 2014 impose a fixed timeframe for notifying proposed amendments to an EHC plan following an annual review
- 2 Whether Regulation 20 must be read with Regulation 22 to require notification of proposed amendments within four weeks of the review meeting
Ratio Decidendi
Regulation 20 must be read with Regulation 22; the plain meaning of 'notify' in Regulation 20(10) in the context of the statutory scheme means that the local authority must notify the relevant people of the substance of the proposed way forward, including a draft of the proposed amendments, within four weeks of the review meeting. The Regulations impose a strict timetable for notifying proposed amendments, and the absence of an express time limit does not justify a flexible or resource-dependent approach.
Court Disposition
Judicial review allowed
Orders
- Declaration that the local authority must notify the substance of proposed amendments to an EHC plan within four weeks of the annual review meeting, in accordance with Regulations 20 and 22.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment