SAP UK Ltd v Diageo Great Britain Ltd [2017] EWHC 189 (TCC) (16 February 2017)
Only Named Users are authorised to use or access mySAP ERP software under the Agreement. Usage by Connect and Gen2 users constitutes unauthorised use or access. SAP is entitled to additional licence and maintenance fees, with quantum to be determined. Diageo is not entitled to declarations of non-infringement or a publicity order. SAP is entitled to an account of fees but not a mandatory injunction for access.
- Citation
- [2017] EWHC 189 (TCC)
- Parties
- Claimant: SAP UK LIMITED; Defendant: DIAGEO GREAT BRITAIN LIMITED
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 16 February 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Contract Dispute / Liability Judgment (quantum Reserved)
- Outcome
- Claim for additional licence and maintenance fees succeeds; quantum reserved. SAP entitled to account of fees. Mandatory injunction for access refused. Diageo's counterclaim for declarations and publicity order refused.
- Legal Topics
- Software Licensing, Interpretation of Contracts, Breach of Contract, Declaratory Relief, Damages, Account of Profits
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
SAP UK LIMITED
Claimant
DIAGEO GREAT BRITAIN LIMITED
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial Contract Dispute / Liability Judgment (quantum Reserved)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether only Named Users are authorised to use or access mySAP ERP software under the Agreement
- 2 Whether usage by Connect and Gen2 users constitutes unauthorised use or access under the Agreement
- 3 Whether SAP is entitled to additional licence and maintenance fees
Ratio Decidendi
Only Named Users are authorised to use or access mySAP ERP software under the Agreement. Usage by Connect and Gen2 users constitutes unauthorised use or access. SAP is entitled to additional licence and maintenance fees, with quantum to be determined. Diageo is not entitled to declarations of non-infringement or a publicity order. SAP is entitled to an account of fees but not a mandatory injunction for access.
Court Disposition
Claim for additional licence and maintenance fees succeeds; quantum reserved. SAP entitled to account of fees. Mandatory injunction for access refused. Diageo's counterclaim for declarations and publicity order refused.
Orders
- SAP entitled to account of additional licence and maintenance fees due from Diageo
- Quantum of fees to be determined in subsequent proceedings
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment