Woodward v Abbey National Plc
The Court of Appeal held that its previous decision in Fadipe v Reed Nursing Personnel cannot stand with the House of Lords decision in Rhys-Harper v Relaxion Group Plc. Despite different statutes, the reasoning in Rhys-Harper regarding the protection of former employees from post-termination victimisation applies...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Appellant: Diana Woodward; Respondent: Abbey National PLC
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 22 June 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From Employment Appeal Tribunal / Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Protected Disclosure, Victimisation, Jurisdiction of Employment Tribunal, Statutory Interpretation
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Diana Woodward
Appellant
Abbey National PLC
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Employment Appeal Tribunal / Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether section 47B of the Employment Rights Act 1996 gives a right not to be subjected to detriment after the contract of employment has terminated
- 2 Whether the Court of Appeal is bound by its previous decision in Fadipe v Reed Nursing Personnel in light of the House of Lords decision in Rhys-Harper v Relaxion Group Plc
Ratio Decidendi
The Court of Appeal held that its previous decision in Fadipe v Reed Nursing Personnel cannot stand with the House of Lords decision in Rhys-Harper v Relaxion Group Plc. Despite different statutes, the reasoning in Rhys-Harper regarding the protection of former employees from post-termination victimisation applies equally to section 47B of the Employment Rights Act 1996. Therefore, section 47B ERA protects workers from detriment suffered after employment has ended, and the Employment Tribunal has jurisdiction to hear such claims.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Matter remitted to the Employment Tribunal for determination
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment