Hall, R v [2010] EWCA Crim 2135 (9 September 2010)

Hall, R v [2010] EWCA Crim 2135 (9 September 2010)

The judge erred in imposing a three-year disqualification and an extended retest, as the circumstances did not warrant a period greater than the statutory minimum or the need for an extended retest; a 12-month disqualification suffices for public protection.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2010] EWCA Crim 2135
Parties
Prosecution: Regina; Appellant: Diane Hall
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
09 September 2010
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Outcome
appeal allowed in part
Legal Topics
Causing Death by Careless Driving, Sentencing, Driving Disqualification
Criminal Law Road Traffic Law Causing Death by Careless Driving Sentencing Driving Disqualification

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Regina

Prosecution

Diane Hall

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the period of driving disqualification and requirement for extended retest imposed for causing death by careless driving were manifestly excessive or wrong in principle

Ratio Decidendi

The judge erred in imposing a three-year disqualification and an extended retest, as the circumstances did not warrant a period greater than the statutory minimum or the need for an extended retest; a 12-month disqualification suffices for public protection.

Court Disposition

appeal allowed in part

Orders

  • Disqualification period reduced to 12 months
  • Requirement for extended retest set aside