Jennifer Baker & Anor v Diane Hewston

Jennifer Baker & Anor v Diane Hewston

Stanley had testamentary capacity when executing his 2020 will. The will was rational on its face, validly executed, and there was no evidence of any disorder of the mind affecting his decisions. The Banks v Goodfellow test remains the applicable standard, and the Mental Capacity Act 2005 does not displace it in probate cases. The 2020 will is admitted to probate, superseding all previous wills.

Parties
Claimant: Jennifer Baker; Claimant: Emma Spiers; Defendant: Diane Hewston
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
11 September 2024
Procedural Posture
Probate / Judgment After Trial and Compromise
Outcome
2020 will admitted to probate; all previous wills superseded; compromise reached with payment to Diane Hewston and a dementia charity; Martin given 28 days to object to pronouncement of validity, failing which he is bound by the judgment.
Legal Topics
Testamentary Capacity, Validity of Wills, Mental Capacity Act 2005, Banks V Goodfellow Test, Probate Proceedings
Succession Law Mental Capacity Law Testamentary Capacity Validity of Wills Mental Capacity Act 2005 Banks V Goodfellow Test Probate Proceedings

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 42 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Jennifer Baker

Claimant

Emma Spiers

Claimant

Diane Hewston

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Probate / Judgment After Trial and Compromise

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the testator, Stanley, had testamentary capacity when executing his wills from 2009 to 2020, particularly the 2020 will
  2. 2 Whether the Mental Capacity Act 2005 applies to probate cases or whether the common law Banks v Goodfellow test remains the standard
  3. 3 Whether the 2020 will was validly executed and reflected the testator's knowledge and approval

Ratio Decidendi

Stanley had testamentary capacity when executing his 2020 will. The will was rational on its face, validly executed, and there was no evidence of any disorder of the mind affecting his decisions. The Banks v Goodfellow test remains the applicable standard, and the Mental Capacity Act 2005 does not displace it in probate cases. The 2020 will is admitted to probate, superseding all previous wills.

Court Disposition

2020 will admitted to probate; all previous wills superseded; compromise reached with payment to Diane Hewston and a dementia charity; Martin given 28 days to object to pronouncement of validity, failing which he is bound by the judgment.

Orders

  • 2020 will of Stanley admitted to probate as valid and operative.
  • All previous wills declared invalid or superseded by the 2020 will.