Ospina, R. v [2017] EWCA Crim 1509 (28 September 2017)
The sentence for possession of a prohibited firearm was reduced from seven years to six years due to the guilty plea, but no exceptional circumstances were found to justify a sentence below the statutory minimum. The overall sentence was not manifestly excessive except for the adjustment for the guilty plea.
- Citation
- [2017] EWCA Crim 1509
- Parties
- Prosecution: Regina; Appellant: Diego Ospina
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 28 September 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal allowed in part
- Legal Topics
- Firearms Offences, Drug Offences, Sentencing, Exceptional Circumstances, Guilty Plea Discount
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Prosecution
Diego Ospina
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence for possession of a prohibited firearm was manifestly excessive
- 2 Whether the guilty plea was sufficiently discounted
- 3 Whether mis-charging amounted to exceptional circumstances justifying a sentence below the statutory minimum
Ratio Decidendi
The sentence for possession of a prohibited firearm was reduced from seven years to six years due to the guilty plea, but no exceptional circumstances were found to justify a sentence below the statutory minimum. The overall sentence was not manifestly excessive except for the adjustment for the guilty plea.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed in part
Orders
- Sentence on count 1 reduced from seven years to six years
- Total sentence substituted: six years and eight months' detention in a young offender institution
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment