Griffin, R v
Section 16 of the Drug Trafficking Act 1994 permits the Crown Court to increase the amount to be recovered under a confiscation order even after it has previously been reduced to nil under section 17, and there is no statutory or procedural bar to such an increase. The reasonable time requirement under Article 6(1)...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Appellant: Dion Howard Griffin; Respondent: Regina
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 24 February 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Confiscation Order
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Confiscation Orders, Statutory Interpretation, Human Rights, Reasonable Time, Variation of Orders
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Dion Howard Griffin
Appellant
Regina
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Confiscation Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a confiscation order reduced to nil can be increased under section 16 of the Drug Trafficking Act 1994
- 2 Whether increasing the confiscation order after a significant lapse of time violates Article 6(1) of the European Convention on Human Rights
Ratio Decidendi
Section 16 of the Drug Trafficking Act 1994 permits the Crown Court to increase the amount to be recovered under a confiscation order even after it has previously been reduced to nil under section 17, and there is no statutory or procedural bar to such an increase. The reasonable time requirement under Article 6(1) ECHR was not violated as there was no unreasonable delay by the state.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- The confiscation order in the sum of £33,897 stands.
- Mr Griffin is ordered to pay £33,897 within six months from 30th April 2007.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment