Revenue And Customs v Direct Affinity Events Ltd & Ors
The Official Receiver's administration and general fees arise on the making of a winding up order but are only recoverable from chargeable receipts; if none exist, the Official Receiver may retain the deposit, and any excess actual costs may be assessed and ordered to be paid by the petitioner at the court's discretion.
- Parties
- Petitioner: HM Revenue and Customs; Respondent: Direct Affinity Events Limited; Respondent: Brian Mee Associates Limited; Respondent: Lesgo Express Import and Export Limited; Respondent: The Official Receiver
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 10 December 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Winding Up Petitions / Post Rescission, Costs Determination
- Outcome
- Court finds that the Official Receiver may retain the deposit in each case; any excess actual costs incurred may be assessed and ordered to be paid by HMRC as petitioner, subject to court's discretion.
- Legal Topics
- Winding Up, Official Receiver Fees, Rescission of Winding Up Orders, Costs Assessment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
HM Revenue and Customs
Petitioner
Direct Affinity Events Limited
Respondent
Brian Mee Associates Limited
Respondent
Lesgo Express Import and Export Limited
Respondent
The Official Receiver
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Winding Up Petitions / Post Rescission, Costs Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Official Receiver is entitled to claim administration and general fees from the petitioner after rescission of winding up orders when no chargeable receipts exist
- 2 Interpretation of the Insolvency Proceedings (Fees) Order 2016 regarding fee recovery
- 3 Court's discretion in assessing costs payable to the Official Receiver
Ratio Decidendi
The Official Receiver's administration and general fees arise on the making of a winding up order but are only recoverable from chargeable receipts; if none exist, the Official Receiver may retain the deposit, and any excess actual costs may be assessed and ordered to be paid by the petitioner at the court's discretion.
Court Disposition
Court finds that the Official Receiver may retain the deposit in each case; any excess actual costs incurred may be assessed and ordered to be paid by HMRC as petitioner, subject to court's discretion.
Orders
- Official Receiver to retain the deposit in each case.
- Any excess actual costs incurred by the Official Receiver to be assessed and, if appropriate, paid by HMRC as petitioner.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment