Traves, R (on the application of) v Director of Public Prosecutions
The justices were entitled to find that the claimant was 'driving' by controlling the vehicle's brakes and steering while being towed, but erred in law by allowing the prosecution to adduce further evidence of disqualification after retiring to consider their verdict, absent special circumstances.
- Parties
- Claimant: Andrew Daniel Traves; Respondent: Director of Public Prosecutions
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 30 June 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Appeal (case Stated) / Judgment on Appeal by Way of Case Stated
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part; conviction for driving while disqualified quashed on technical grounds; other convictions upheld.
- Legal Topics
- Driving While Disqualified, Admissibility of Evidence After Retirement, Meaning of 'driving' Under Road Traffic Act, Procedure in Magistrates' Courts
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Andrew Daniel Traves
Claimant
Director of Public Prosecutions
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Appeal (case Stated) / Judgment on Appeal by Way of Case Stated
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether being in control of a towed vehicle constitutes 'driving' under the Road Traffic Act 1988
- 2 Whether justices may allow prosecution to adduce further evidence after retiring to consider their verdict
Ratio Decidendi
The justices were entitled to find that the claimant was 'driving' by controlling the vehicle's brakes and steering while being towed, but erred in law by allowing the prosecution to adduce further evidence of disqualification after retiring to consider their verdict, absent special circumstances.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part; conviction for driving while disqualified quashed on technical grounds; other convictions upheld.
Orders
- Conviction for driving while disqualified quashed.
- Convictions for driving without insurance and using a motor vehicle without a current test certificate upheld.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment