Parry v Director of Public Prosecutions [2004] EWHC 3112 (Admin) (21 December 2004)
The statement made to police was not made 'immediately after' the offence as required by section 28(1)(a) of the Crime and Disorder Act 1998, and thus the conviction for racially aggravated criminal damage could not stand.
- Citation
- [2004] EWHC 3112 (Admin)
- Parties
- Claimant: Peter Mark Parry; Defendant: Director of Public Prosecutions
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 21 December 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal by Way of Case Stated / Judgment on Appeal From Crown Court Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; conviction quashed
- Legal Topics
- Racially Aggravated Offences, Criminal Damage, Interpretation of Statutes
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Peter Mark Parry
Claimant
Director of Public Prosecutions
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Appeal by Way of Case Stated / Judgment on Appeal From Crown Court Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the requirement of 'immediately before or after' in section 28(1)(a) Crime and Disorder Act 1998 was satisfied by the facts
- 2 Whether hostility can be demonstrated in the victim's absence and in the defendant's home
- 3 Whether the Crown Court erred in law in upholding the conviction for racially aggravated criminal damage
Ratio Decidendi
The statement made to police was not made 'immediately after' the offence as required by section 28(1)(a) of the Crime and Disorder Act 1998, and thus the conviction for racially aggravated criminal damage could not stand.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; conviction quashed
Orders
- Decision of the Crown Court dismissing the appeal is quashed
- Conviction in the Magistrates' Court on the aggravated criminal damage charge is quashed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment