Core (UK) Limited v Benjamin Puncher & Anor

Core (UK) Limited v Benjamin Puncher & Anor

BP and AP have a real prospect of achieving at trial a result in which they are not required to make payment of the amount for which summary judgment is claimed, due to overlapping issues with the unfair prejudice petition and buy-out proceedings. Summary judgment is refused.

Parties
Claimant: Core (UK) Limited; First Defendant: Benjamin Puncher; Second Defendant: Ara Puncher
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
31 July 2025
Procedural Posture
Civil / Summary Judgment Application
Outcome
summary judgment application dismissed
Legal Topics
Director's Duties, Fiduciary Duty, Dishonest Assistance, Summary Judgment, Unfair Prejudice, Remuneration, Company Loans

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 13
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Core (UK) Limited

Claimant

Benjamin Puncher

First Defendant

Ara Puncher

Second Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil / Summary Judgment Application

  1. 1 Whether summary judgment should be granted against Benjamin Puncher for admitted payments and loan
  2. 2 Whether informal arrangements among shareholders justify the payments
  3. 3 Whether payments to directors without proper authorisation are lawful

Ratio Decidendi

BP and AP have a real prospect of achieving at trial a result in which they are not required to make payment of the amount for which summary judgment is claimed, due to overlapping issues with the unfair prejudice petition and buy-out proceedings. Summary judgment is refused.

Court Disposition

summary judgment application dismissed

Orders

  • Summary judgment application against Benjamin Puncher is dismissed.