Distinctive Properties (Ascot) Ltd v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government & Anor [2015] EWCA Civ 1250 (08 December 2015)
A Tree Replacement Notice under a woodland TPO cannot require more trees to be planted than were removed, but the number of trees lost may be estimated using standard planting densities, and the statutory term 'tree' includes seedlings and saplings; the inspector lawfully relied on the Council's estimate and there was no legal error in the decision.
- Citation
- [2015] EWCA Civ 1250
- Parties
- Appellant: Distinctive Properties (Ascot) Limited; First Respondent: Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government; Second Respondent: Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 08 December 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal From High Court
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Tree Preservation Orders, Tree Replacement Notices, Statutory Interpretation, Burden of Proof, Woodland Management
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Distinctive Properties (Ascot) Limited
Appellant
Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government
First Respondent
Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal From High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a Tree Replacement Notice (TRN) can require planting of more trees than were removed under a woodland Tree Preservation Order (TPO)
- 2 Whether 'seedlings' are included in the statutory meaning of 'tree' for TPO/TRN purposes
- 3 Whether the inspector lawfully estimated the number of trees lost and required to be replaced
Ratio Decidendi
A Tree Replacement Notice under a woodland TPO cannot require more trees to be planted than were removed, but the number of trees lost may be estimated using standard planting densities, and the statutory term 'tree' includes seedlings and saplings; the inspector lawfully relied on the Council's estimate and there was no legal error in the decision.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment