Channon v Channon [2002] EWCA Civ 537 (15 April 2002)
The request for permission was insufficiently precise to justify granting permission to appeal; however, the application was adjourned for three months to allow further developments.
- Citation
- [2002] EWCA Civ 537
- Parties
- Petitioner/respondent: Carol Margaret Channon; Respondent/applicant: Robert Derek Channon
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 15 April 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Permission to Appeal / Court of Appeal, Adjournment
- Outcome
- Application adjourned for three months.
- Legal Topics
- Divorce Finalisation, Appeal Procedure, Ancillary Relief
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Parties
Carol Margaret Channon
Petitioner/respondent
Robert Derek Channon
Respondent/applicant
Procedural Posture
Application for Permission to Appeal / Court of Appeal, Adjournment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether permission should be granted to appeal the refusal to allow an application to finalise divorce
Ratio Decidendi
The request for permission was insufficiently precise to justify granting permission to appeal; however, the application was adjourned for three months to allow further developments.
Court Disposition
Application adjourned for three months.
Orders
- Post-judgment exchanges in Court of Appeal on 5 March 2002 to be transcribed at public expense, copies to court and applicant.
- This judgment to be transcribed at public expense, copy sent to applicant.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment