Olafisoye v Olafisoye
The court found that the wife was habitually resident in England and Wales for at least a year immediately before the date of her petition and, in the alternative, was domiciled in England and Wales on that date. Therefore, the court has jurisdiction to entertain the wife's amended petition for divorce.
- Parties
- Petitioner/wife: Eno Elim Olafisoye; Respondent/husband: Chief Adebiyi Obiajulu Olafisoye
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 19 February 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Divorce and Ancillary Relief / Jurisdictional Determination
- Outcome
- Jurisdiction established; court will entertain the wife's amended petition for divorce.
- Legal Topics
- Divorce Jurisdiction, Habitual Residence, Domicile, Recognition of Foreign Divorce, Brussels II Regulation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Eno Elim Olafisoye
Petitioner/wife
Chief Adebiyi Obiajulu Olafisoye
Respondent/husband
Procedural Posture
Divorce and Ancillary Relief / Jurisdictional Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the High Court of England and Wales has jurisdiction to entertain the wife's petition for divorce under the Domicile and Matrimonial Proceedings Act 1973 and Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 (Brussels IIa)
- 2 Whether the wife was habitually resident or domiciled in England and Wales on the date of the petition (17 May 2005)
- 3 Whether the spouses were last habitually resident in England and Wales and the wife still resided there on the date of petition
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the wife was habitually resident in England and Wales for at least a year immediately before the date of her petition and, in the alternative, was domiciled in England and Wales on that date. Therefore, the court has jurisdiction to entertain the wife's amended petition for divorce.
Court Disposition
Jurisdiction established; court will entertain the wife's amended petition for divorce.
Orders
- The court holds that it has jurisdiction to entertain the wife's amended petition for divorce on the grounds of habitual residence and, if necessary, domicile.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment