DJ v SSWP (DLA)
The appellant's night-time care needs, requiring prolonged or repeated attention for 30 to 60 minutes on four nights and five to six hours on three nights per week, are substantially in excess of the normal requirements for a child of his age. The statutory test for the middle rate care component is met.
- Parties
- Appellant: DJ; Respondent: SSWP
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 06 April 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Upper Tribunal Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; First-tier Tribunal decision set aside and remade.
- Legal Topics
- Disability Living Allowance, Care Component, Mobility Component, Children's Entitlement
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
DJ
Appellant
SSWP
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Upper Tribunal Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant's night-time care needs meet the statutory test for the middle rate care component of disability living allowance
- 2 Whether the First-tier Tribunal erred in law by applying an incorrect standard to the 'substantially in excess' test for children under 16
Ratio Decidendi
The appellant's night-time care needs, requiring prolonged or repeated attention for 30 to 60 minutes on four nights and five to six hours on three nights per week, are substantially in excess of the normal requirements for a child of his age. The statutory test for the middle rate care component is met.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; First-tier Tribunal decision set aside and remade.
Orders
- Appellant is entitled to the care component of disability living allowance at the middle rate only from 14 October 2014 to 13 October 2016.
- No entitlement to the mobility component.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment