Angus v Emmott & Anor

Angus v Emmott & Anor

Due to deadlock, animosity, and distrust among executors, and the need for impartial administration, all current executors are removed and replaced by a professional solicitor to ensure proper execution of the estate and timely submission of the compensation claim.

Parties
Claimant: Margaret Angus; Defendant: Donald Emmott; Defendant: Angela Emmott
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
03 February 2010
Procedural Posture
Application in the Administration of Estate / Judgment
Outcome
All current executors removed; professional solicitor appointed as sole personal representative.
Legal Topics
Removal of Executors, Submission of Compensation Claim, Deadlock Between Executors, Discretion of Court in Estate Matters

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 11 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Margaret Angus

Claimant

Donald Emmott

Defendant

Angela Emmott

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Application in the Administration of Estate / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the submission for compensation should be filed in its current form
  2. 2 Whether the statement of Anthony Steel should be included in the submission
  3. 3 Whether Mr. and Mrs. Emmott should be removed as executors

Ratio Decidendi

Due to deadlock, animosity, and distrust among executors, and the need for impartial administration, all current executors are removed and replaced by a professional solicitor to ensure proper execution of the estate and timely submission of the compensation claim.

Court Disposition

All current executors removed; professional solicitor appointed as sole personal representative.

Orders

  • Gina Fairfax, a partner at Bishop & Sewell LLP, to be appointed as sole personal representative upon confirmation of independence and willingness.
  • Draft minute of order to be drawn up; costs arguments to be heard at hand down.