Leonardo Private Equity Fund Ltd v Loscalzo [2006] EWHC 30 (QB) (03 February 2006)

Leonardo Private Equity Fund Ltd v Loscalzo [2006] EWHC 30 (QB) (03 February 2006)

The Defendant did not have authority to commit the Claimant to the Giacomelli investment and made misrepresentations regarding the terms. The Claimant did not have actual or imputed knowledge of the true terms and did not ratify the Defendant's actions. The Claimant suffered financial loss as a result of the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2006] EWHC 30 (QB)
Parties
Claimant: Leonardo Private Equity Fund Limited; Defendant: Donato Loscalzo
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
03 February 2006
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment
Outcome
Judgment for the Claimant
Legal Topics
Fraudulent Misrepresentation, Authority of Agents, Ratification, Indemnity, Quantum of Damages
Contract Law Tort Law Fraudulent Misrepresentation Authority of Agents Ratification Indemnity Quantum of Damages

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Leonardo Private Equity Fund Limited

Claimant

Donato Loscalzo

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Defendant fraudulently misrepresented the terms of the Giacomelli investment to the Claimant
  2. 2 Whether the Defendant had authority to commit the Claimant to the investment
  3. 3 Whether the Claimant had actual or imputed knowledge of the true terms

Ratio Decidendi

The Defendant did not have authority to commit the Claimant to the Giacomelli investment and made misrepresentations regarding the terms. The Claimant did not have actual or imputed knowledge of the true terms and did not ratify the Defendant's actions. The Claimant suffered financial loss as a result of the Defendant's conduct.

Court Disposition

Judgment for the Claimant

Orders

  • Defendant to pay the sum already paid out by the Claimant in respect of the Giacomelli investment
  • Defendant to indemnify the Claimant for any further claims arising from the investment