Northumbrian Water Limited v Doosan Enpure Limited & Anor

Northumbrian Water Limited v Doosan Enpure Limited & Anor

The adjudication decision is binding and enforceable as a contractual obligation unless and until revised by arbitration. The JV did not raise any valid challenge to the adjudicator’s jurisdiction or procedural fairness, and any right to challenge has been lost. The enforcement claim is not a matter to be referred...

Source-derived case information.

Parties
Claimant: Northumbrian Water Limited; Defendant: Doosan Enpure Limited; Defendant: Tilbury Douglas Construction Limited (formerly Interserve Construction Limited)
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
14 November 2022
Procedural Posture
Commercial Construction Dispute / Summary Judgment Application and Application for Stay Pending Arbitration
Outcome
Summary judgment granted for the claimant; application for stay refused.
Legal Topics
Adjudication Enforcement, Arbitration Stay, Summary Judgment, Dispute Resolution Clauses
Construction Law Contract Law Arbitration Adjudication Enforcement Arbitration Stay Summary Judgment Dispute Resolution Clauses

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 14 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Northumbrian Water Limited

Claimant

Doosan Enpure Limited

Defendant

Tilbury Douglas Construction Limited (formerly Interserve Construction Limited)

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Commercial Construction Dispute / Summary Judgment Application and Application for Stay Pending Arbitration

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the adjudication decision is binding and enforceable as a contractual obligation
  2. 2 Whether enforcement proceedings should be stayed pending arbitration under section 9 of the Arbitration Act 1996

Ratio Decidendi

The adjudication decision is binding and enforceable as a contractual obligation unless and until revised by arbitration. The JV did not raise any valid challenge to the adjudicator’s jurisdiction or procedural fairness, and any right to challenge has been lost. The enforcement claim is not a matter to be referred to arbitration under the contract, so a stay under section 9 of the Arbitration Act 1996 is refused. NWL is entitled to summary judgment.

Court Disposition

Summary judgment granted for the claimant; application for stay refused.

Orders

  • Summary judgment for Northumbrian Water Limited in the sum of £22,458,540.04 plus interest and costs.
  • Refusal of the defendants’ application for a stay of proceedings for arbitration.