Vinter, R v

Vinter, R v

Given the appellant's previous conviction for murder, the premeditated and aggravated nature of the second murder, and the absence of mitigating factors sufficient to justify departure from the norm, a whole life term was appropriate for punishment and deterrence.

Parties
Prosecutor: Regina; Appellant: Douglas Gary Vinter
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
25 June 2009
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Murder, Sentencing, Life Imprisonment, Whole Life Order, Dangerousness
Criminal Law Murder Sentencing Life Imprisonment Whole Life Order Dangerousness

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Regina

Prosecutor

Douglas Gary Vinter

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the imposition of a whole life term was appropriate for a second conviction of murder
  2. 2 Whether the sentencing judge misdirected himself by focusing on future dangerousness rather than the seriousness of the offence

Ratio Decidendi

Given the appellant's previous conviction for murder, the premeditated and aggravated nature of the second murder, and the absence of mitigating factors sufficient to justify departure from the norm, a whole life term was appropriate for punishment and deterrence.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The sentence of life imprisonment with a whole life term is upheld.